1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Interview with day program staff said that they had not had experiences with C1 displaying these behaviors towards the same sex, but had several incidents of C1’s inappropriate behaviors towards the opposite sex, including clients and staff. Outside sources only reported verbal inappropriateness by C1. Interview with a third-party source said this was the first time C1 displayed inappropriate behaviors they were aware of, especially in reference to the same sex. The outside source was aware that C1 had behaviors towards the opposite sex outside the facility; however, it was the first time they experienced this type of behavior from C1 while at the facility, and the behavior has been addressed with the client. Interview statements from C1 admitted the behavior occurred and expressed remorse. A review of records revealed that C1 has been residing at this facility less than one year. Facility records showed that C1 displayed verbally aggressive behaviors at the facility but no physical inappropriateness. C1’s placement referral disclosed past inappropriate activity along with emotional outbursts, and displays of inappropriate attention toward the opposite sex but no indication of physically inappropriate interactions towards males or females. Further records showed that client #2 (C2) had a history of removing their clothing in public places, displaying inappropriate behavior that occurred spontaneously and appeared to have been a willing participant in the sexual behaviors. The facility is in the process of obtaining behavioral consultation to address both clients behaviors and determine effective strategies to mitigate further incidents.
Based on the Department’s investigation of the above-mentioned allegation and the evidence obtained during staff, client(s) and outside source interviews, records reviewed, and LPA observations, there is insufficient evidence to meet the preponderance of evidence standard. Therefore, the above allegation is deemed to be unsubstantiated.
The report was discussed, and an exit interview was conducted with Licensee Wilson Weed. A copy of this report along with Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC9058 3/22) were provided to Licensee Weed at the conclusion of the visit. The signature below confirms the receipt of these documents. |