1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | observed a written note (observational staff notes) from the staff member (S1) who first observed the injury. In this note, S1 states "This morning we found the resident with a bruise on his forehead, apparently from a fall in the night". Since facility staff have no evidence of the bruise and bump coming from anything other than a fall and the resident has numerous past documented falls, the most likely explanation is that R1 fell during the night, as noted in S1's staff note. Despite R1's documented history of multiple falls, R1 was not reassessed by the facility and no changes were made to R1's Service Plan to address R1's potential fall risk.
Therefore, due to record review and interviews, the allegation of "Resident had unwitnessed fall resulting in injury." is SUBSTANTIATED.
Regarding allegation "Facility staff are not assisting resident with hygiene needs.": LPA Colvin reviewed pertinent records for Resident (R1) and interviewed care staff and MCD Beatrice. LPA Colvin additionally met with R1 in their private room and observed R1's fingernails to be overgrown. Through interviews conducted, LPA Colvin learned that while the facility has services available for R1 to have their nails cleaned and filed (at an additional charge), facility staff did not notify R1's representative of the status of R1's nails, and their need for cleaning/filing. MCD Beatrice admitted to R1's nails needing attention at their current state, and that a conversation was had with R1's representative only after the representative brought up the concern to MCD Beatrice during a meeting at the facility.
Due to the facility failing to notify the representative of the need for R1's nails to be cleaned/filed, facility staff either failed to observe this unmet need or failed to ensure R1 received care for their nails. R1's file has numerous documents stating that R1 needs assistance with reminders for grooming. Therefore, based on observations and interviews, the allegation "Facility staff are not assisting resident with hygiene needs." is SUBSTANTIATED.
A finding that the complaint is SUBSTANTIATED means that the allegation(s) is valid because the preponderance of the evidence standard has been met.
Due to observations made by LPA Colvin, the facility was cited, and deficiencies noted on LIC 9099 D. An exit interview was conducted where this report and appeal rights were discussed. A copy this report, LIC 9099D, and appeal rights were provided to Memory Care Director Beatrice Bracamonte during the exit interview. |