1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | (Continued from LIC9099)
Records review further confirmed that the eviction letter was sent to R1 and their responsible party on 5/1/23, with the reason for eviction being the visitor's violation of the House Rules, a subsection of the Residence and Services Agreement. Additional staff and resident interviews corroborated the disruptive behaviors of R1’s visitor that was documented in both letters of concern and eviction notice.
Title 22 87224(a)(3) states the following: (a) The licensee may evict a resident for… (3) "Failure of the resident to comply with general policies of the facility". The regulation does not support eviction based on a non-resident's behavior, therefore the consequence of eviction due to R1's visitor's behavior is not valid.
Based on relevant interviews and records review, the preponderance of evidence has been met that the alleged violation occurred and is therefore substantiated. Deficiencies are cited per California Code of Regulations, Title 22 (refer to the attached LIC 9099-D). A Plan of Correction was jointly developed with the Licensee. An exit interview was conducted with Executive Director Sam El-Rabaa, to whom a copy of this report, the LIC811 Confidential Names List, and the Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC9058 03/22) were provided. |