1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | (Continued from LIC9099 p.1)
Staff informed that proposals had been made to further correct the doors, and the information was communicated to residents during the monthly Town Hall meeting with the Executive Director. These statements by staff were corroborated by records from 2 (two) independent contractors, and the resident Town Hall meeting notes.
Residents interviewed confirmed that the doors were heavy and closed too quickly, resulting in a prior fall with minor injury. While residents expressed concern with possible future injuries regarding the doors, they also acknowledged that the Licensee had been working on the issue, but were dissatisfied with how long it has taken.
Outside source interview revealed knowledge of the residents' concerns about the doors, with no knowledge of what the Licensee had done to address the issue.
Records review revealed email communication, outside contractor proposals, invoices from work completed, and Town Hall meeting notes. These records gave evidence to the fact that the Licensee had been addressing the issue of the doors since November 2023 and communicating the progress to residents.
During an unannounced facility visit, LPA directly observed the doors in question, as well as their operation. LPA observed that the doors were slightly heavier than a regular door, and the bathroom doors closed quickly after being opened, with little resistance or delay. The doors and door frames contained permanent metal tags with serial numbers on them. The tags contained the following statements: "Meets UL 10C/NFPA 252 requirements positive pressure. Do not remove or cover this label". This gave evidence to the doors meeting code regulations.
Although the issue of the doors was proven to exist, evidence was not found to prove that the Licensee did not make efforts to correct it.
Based on interviews, direct LPA observations and records review, a preponderance of evidence does not exist to prove that the alleged violation occurred, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. An exit interview was conducted with Executive Director Sam El Rabaa, to whom a copy of this report and the Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC9058 03/22) were provided. |