| (Continued from LIC9099 p.1)
Staff informed that R1 initially moved into the Assisted Living section of the facility, and was subsequently moved to Memory Care after progressive confusion and combativeness. Staff noted that R2 visited R1 daily in Memory Care and was present when R1 was being given care by staff. Management noted that throughout the internal investigation, R1 was unable to provide details such as which staff member was being accused, or when the incident occurred.
Staff 1 (S1) denied handling R1 roughly and confirmed that two staff were always present while care was being provided to R1. S1 additionally stated that R2 was typically present as well, just outside of the door for privacy. S1 informed that R1 accepted care easily and there were no issues.
Attempts were made to interview R1 regarding the allegation, however, R1 was unable to be qualified as a valid historian due to impaired cognition. R2 was interviewed during the investigation and informed that they were in the room during the timeframe of incident. R2 stated that the staff did not handle R1 roughly during the timeframe of concern and had never handled R1 roughly.
Review of facility records corroborated staff statements of R1's combativeness and increased confusion. Records additionally showed that the facility took immediate action once made aware of the accusation and initiated an internal investigation.
Based on interviews, direct LPA observations and records review, a preponderance of evidence does not exist to prove that the alleged violation occurred, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. This report and the Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC9058 03/22) were mailed to the last known mailing address for the Licensee.
|