1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Continued from LIC9099
Interviews were conducted with current and former staff, who did not corroborate the allegation. No interviewed staff advised that they had been told to give any resident medication outside of their prescription and had not observed any other staff being told to do so. Interviews with outside sources who frequently visited the facility revealed no observation of staff medicating residents incorrectly and no observations of staff being told to do so by management. Facility records reviewed during the timeframe of the complaint showed that the resident in question was given the medications and dosages according to prescription.
Regarding the second allegation, “Uncleared staff working at facility”, it was alleged that underage and undocumented staff were providing care to residents. Interviews were conducted with current and former staff, who claimed they had no knowledge of anyone uncleared or underage giving care to residents at the facility. Interviews revealed that children did live on the facility property previously with their parents who were employees, in the apartments above the facility reserved for staff. Interviews revealed that these children did not come down into the facility and did not attempt to give care to any resident. Outside source interviews denied ever having seen underage or uncleared staff working at the facility. Review of facility records confirmed that all staff listed on the employee roster had background clearances. During 3 unannounced facility visits, LPA did not observe any children present at the facility, or any staff member working at the facility that was not listed on the employee roster.
Regarding the third allegation, “Licensee illegally evicted resident”, it was alleged that management instructed staff members not to allow a resident back to the facility after a hospitalization. LPA interviewed the outside agency staff involved in the resident in question’s care and placement. The interview revealed that the resident was moved to a different facility due to their increasing needs, as the resident’s level of care became inconsistent with what Ranchview Senior Assisted Living could provide. Interview revealed that the facility and agency were in communication about the resident’s placement and the resident was moved to a different facility that provided a higher level of care. The agency denied that the resident was unlawfully evicted and confirmed that at no time did the facility refuse to take the resident back. Staff interviews revealed that management was working with the agency to find a solution to meet the resident’s needs at the facility, including possibly providing a resource for 1-1 care; but the agency was able to find a different facility for the resident.
Continued on LIC9099-C |