1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | During the response, OS spoke with the NOC staff member, who explained they were assigned only to the memory care unit and were not supposed to leave that area. The staff member stated, “We don’t have any staff for this part of the building.” OS noted that this NOC staff member was the only worker in the building until a day shift employee arrived around 6:00 AM. OS asked the day shift employee about bedridden residents, and the employee stated they believed there were three but could not accurately identify their locations. This information did not align with the training expectations related to the facility’s application for bedridden fire clearance.
Staff interviews showed inconsistent understanding of resident supervision needs and emergency procedures. One staff member stated that although they personally felt trained in memory care and bedridden resident needs, they did not believe staff in the past were well trained in fire safety or in supporting bedridden residents. Staff stated that overall training varied depending on which employees were working and that not all staff were confident in emergency response. Interview with newly hired Resident Services Director confirmed that they were told by staff they only work in their assigned areas. RSD advised staff they are required to work in every area of the facility if and when needed.
Information gathered also raised concerns about fire safety readiness. Staff were unable to accurately identify bedridden residents, which is essential for evacuation planning and emergency response. Staff statements and observed gaps in knowledge demonstrated that fire safety training was not adequate and did not match the facility’s reported training efforts.
Evidence gathered throughout the investigation also showed that the facility did not have sufficient staff to provide proper care and supervision. The building had only one staff member on duty overnight, who was assigned exclusively to the memory care unit and did not monitor residents in other parts of the facility. As a result, R1’s fall went unnoticed, pendant calls were unanswered, and residents outside of memory care did not receive adequate supervision during overnight hours.
Based on the information obtained both allegations are substantiated. California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8, is being cited on the attached LIC9099-D. The report was discussed, plan of correction was jointly developed, and an exit interview was conducted with Amber Rodgers. A copy of this report, along with Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC9058 3/22), were provided to Amber Rodgers at the conclusion of the visit. The signature below confirms the receipt of these documents.
|