1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | (continue from LIC9099C)
Staff stated they observed that C1’s behavior became less aggressive. Although staff were following the doctor’s orders, staff should have actively and regularly observed C1 for changes in physical, mental, emotional, and social functioning and bring observed changes to the attention of C1’s physician. Instead, staff continued to medicate C1 according to the doctor’s orders despite the observed side effects (dizziness and drowsiness) C1 was displaying. A review of the warning side effects for the medication indicated that if any of the side effects last or get worse, to consult the attending physician, or pharmacist promptly. In addition, staff continued to send C1 to school despite displaying the negative side effects. During interviews, staff stated they had reached out to the psychiatrist and medical provider regarding C1’s change in condition, on 8/27/24, 8/28/24, and 9/12/24 during the period C1 was attending school in an over medicated state. Note: Only one (9/12/24) of the three follow-up visits was an in-person visit where C1 was physically evaluated by a physician.
It was also alleged that staff did not communicate effectively. It was specifically alleged that school personnel were not able to get in touch via telephone/text with facility staff during several of the emergency incidents involving C1 at school. For instance, on August 13, 2024, school staff called and sent multiple messages to facility staff to no avail. A review of the messages sent to the facility administrator in the morning to notify them of the 911 call and that C1 had been transported to the hospital showed the administrator's reply later in the afternoon. The same situation occurred on August 14, 2024; the school personnel was not able to get in touch with the administrator promptly. In addition, on August 15, 2024, when school personnel transported C1 back to the facility, staff were not present at the facility, and the school nurse and bus driver waited outside the facility for an extended period for facility staff to arrive. During interviews with facility staff, it was indicated that staff were not scheduled to work or be present at the facility when the clients attended school/day programs. The facility administrator stated that they normally attend to phone messages promptly and denied not being accessible via telephone. CCL had similar experiences with difficulties getting in touch with the administrator. LPA attempted three (3) visits at the facility on July 3, 25, and August 21, 2024, there were no staff present at the facility when the LPA arrived, and had a difficult time getting in touch with the facility administrator via telephone. During all three visits, the facility administrator eventually called back, and LPA was able to complete the visit at the facility 2- 3 hours after the attempted visit. (Continue at LIC 9099C) |