1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | [CONTINUED FROM LIC 9099]
In their interviews, C1 and their housemates denied that S1 or any other facility staff shouted/yelled at them. S1 also denied the allegation. LPA observed during his multiple facility visits that C1 frequently exhibited behaviors that required staff redirection; interviews of staff and other clients confirmed this. C1 admitted to LPA that they sometimes yelled at S1 and other facility staff but said staff do not yell back at them.
However, in separate interviews, three (3) other sources corroborated they witnessed and/or heard S1 become frustrated with C1, shouting/yelling at C1. In each of these instances, the witnesses said S1 was trying to get C1 to do something, but S1’s emotion and volume were concerning. There was no indication of S1 using profane language towards C1.
Based on interviews, a preponderance of evidence exists to show that Licensee’s staff (S1) yelled at a client (C1). The allegation is therefore Substantiated. One (1) deficiency was cited per California Code of Regulations, Title 22 (refer to the attached LIC 9099-D page). A Plan of Correction were jointly developed with the Licensee.
An exit interview was conducted with Gil Antonio, to whom a copy of this report, the LIC 9099-D page, the LIC811 Confidential Names List, and the Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC9058 03/22) were provided. |