1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | (Continued from LIC9099 p.1)
Staff members interviewed consistently recited the procedures put in place for supervision and care of residents. Staff interview further revealed that R1's behavior was likely pre-meditated, as R1 had re-dressed themselves in the middle of the night, disarmed their bedroom alarm, and climbed over the backyard fence to exit the facility without staff knowledge.
Outside source interview revealed no concerns regarding the Licensee's care and supervision of R1. One outside source informed that the incident was a new behavior for R1, triggered by a visitation pattern disruption. A second outside source expressed no observations or concerns regarding resident supervision by the Licensee.
Records review revealed that R1 suffered from a cognitive impairment but was able to leave the facility without assistance. While records showed that R1 experienced confusion and disorientation, no records were found to show that R1 had a history of exit-seeking behaviors.
During an unannounced facility visit, LPA directly observed working, in-tact alarms on all exit doors at the facility, including in resident rooms.
Due to their baseline memory loss, R1 was unable to participate as a reliable historian/interviewee about the incident.
Based on interviews, direct LPA observations and records review, the investigation did not yield sufficient evidence to conclude that lack of supervision led to resident AWOL. Based upon the foregoing, the allegation is unsubstantiated. This finding means that although the allegation may have happened or may be valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred." An exit interview was conducted with Administrator Bella Morales, to whom a copy of this report and the Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC9058 03/22) were provided. |