1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | It also showed the responsible party agreed R1 should not return and needed a higher level of care to get medications managed. Per ED’s documentation, R1’s responsible party would be informing the hospital and medical provider not to discharge R1 back to the facility. Grossmont Gardens Assisted Living Observations documentation dated 04/04/25 indicated the ED spoke with R1’s responsible party and the responsible party stated they would be at the facility over the weekend to move R1’s items out. It also stated R1 will not be returning and will be going to a higher level of care. The documentation dated 04/05/25 stated the hospital called and was attempting to set up transportation back to the facility. The facility nurse advised the hospital that R1 was not returning per R1’s responsible party and the responsible party wanted R1 to go to a higher level of care facility. The facility’s documentation stated the hospital staff will contact the responsible party. The facility nurse’s interview revealed they did not deny R1’s return to the facility but was following the instructions of R1’s responsible party. The hospital staff’s interview confirmed the facility nurse did not deny the return of R1. However, conflicting information was provided and needed to be confirmed. The facility’s documentation dated 04/06/25 indicated R1’s responsible party was provided all of R1’s medications, as they were no longer going to reside at the facility. There was some miscommunication between the facility, R1’s responsible party, and the hospital. It was agreed upon by the ED and R1’s responsible party that R1 required a higher level of care but a date was not determined for relocation. However, the documentation identified 04/03/25, which was prior to the discharge date, that R1 would not be returning to the facility, per R1’s responsible party. Per facility staff, R1 was not evicted or issued a notice of eviction, the facility acted upon the discussion had with R1’s responsible party and supplied that information to the hospital staff.
During the course of the investigation, interviews were conducted, and records were reviewed. Investigation revealed inconsistent statements and information obtained did not present a preponderance of evidence to support or corroborate the allegation. The allegation was deemed unsubstantiated. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report along with Licensee Rights (LIC 9058 03/22) were provided to Health Services Director, Stacy Tinoco whose signature below confirms receipt of these rights. [See LIC 811 Confidential Names List to identify Resident #1]
|