1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | The on-call physician provided the outdated medication list, which was signed and dated by the physician. A review of facility records reflected the medication list from the primary care physician’s office showed the medication list was current as of 11/14/23 and was signed by a physician on 11/17/23, indicating it was accurate.
The facility’s internal records reflected R1’s responsible party was notified that an eye drop brought into the facility with the other medications was not present on the medication list. The facility made the responsible party aware they cannot dispense the eye drop without an order. The facility was aware of medication protocols and provided medications that were present and prescribed. R1’s interview revealed they were provided with more medications than they usually take. Also, R1 confirmed their regular primary care physician was out on leave and the assistant provided them with an outdated list. R1’s physician’s office provided a current medication list dated 11/28/23, which reflected less medications. The facility followed R1’s physician’s orders on file and administered the medications as prescribed by the physician. The facility did not overmedicate R1, the medication orders were followed.
During the course of the investigation, interviews were conducted, and records were reviewed. Investigation revealed inconsistent statements and information obtained did not present a preponderance of evidence to support or corroborate the allegation. The allegation was deemed unsubstantiated. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report along with Licensee Rights (LIC 9058 03/22) were provided to Executive Director, Reginald Jones whose signature below confirms receipt of these rights.
|