1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | (Continued from LIC9099)
Department interviews with Staff #1(S1) revealed they reported having ongoing communication with R1’s authorized representative as well as R1’s placement agency. S1 stated the facility intended to reassess R1 prior to return and denied refusing the resident’s return. S1 reported speaking with R1’s attending physician regarding behavioral concerns and R1’s inability to take prescribed medication.
S1 stated they informed the hospital social worker that R1 would not be able to return at the current date due to these concerns per attending physician as follows: S1 explained that according to R1 attending physician R1 would require at least three additional weeks in behavioral health services, followed by potential placement at a skilled nursing facility to allow for injectable medication to support behavioral stabilization.
Department Interviews with Placement Agency / Responsible Party confirmed communication with S1 regarding R1’s behavioral concerns, medication non-compliance, and the anticipated need for continued behavioral health treatment. They also confirmed staff were communicating updates about reassessment requirements and possible next steps for R1’s care and discharge planning.
Based on interviews and records review, a preponderance of evidence does not exist to prove that the alleged violations occurred. Therefore, the allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED.
An exit interview was conducted with Angela Scot-Kapiloff, to whom a copy of this report and the Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC 9058 03/22) were provided.
|