1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Records also noted R1 was diagnosed with COPD, diabetes, Parkinson’s, GERD, arthritis, and HIV at the time of admission. R1’s records further disclosed that R1 did not require incontinence care, although they occasionally experienced urgency.
A review of R1’s records and staff interviews showed no change of condition or decline in ADLs prior to R1’s voluntary relocation. At the time of the visit, it was confirmed that R1 had voluntarily relocated to another facility on March 31, 2026. The ED also disclosed that prior to relocating, R1 began displaying behavioral and mental health concerns, such as hitting themselves in the head, although no previous behavioral concerns were documented in R1’s facility records.
Additional review of resident records confirmed R1 was assessed at a care level of “0,” requiring no care, consistent with their medical records maintained at the facility. Interviews with staff revealed they had no knowledge of R1 being incontinent, nor was incontinence care included in R1’s care plan. Interviews with other residents corroborated that they were unaware of R1 experiencing incontinence. LPA attempted to contact R1 multiple times but was unsuccessful. Additional staff interviews confirmed R1 was independent with all ADLs, including toileting. Regarding the allegation that staff did not respond in a timely manner to a pendant pull from R1, a review of the facility’s pendant call logs from March through April showed no pendant pulls initiated by R1. Interviews with residents (R2–R4) revealed no concerns with staff response time. One resident (R2), who lived directly next door to R1 and had regular communication with them, reported that R1 frequently expressed feelings that others were “out to get them” and tended to have “a chip on their shoulder.” Residents interviewed expressed satisfaction with staff and the services provided. R2 stated that “staff have been nothing but good to them.[See LIC 811 for confidential names list]
Based on record review and interviews, the allegations that the facility did not provide timely attention to a pendant call and that staff failed to provide incontinence care to R1 were determined to be Unsubstantiated. An exit interview was conducted with ED Lewis who was notified a copy of the report will be provided at the conclusion of the visit. Signature below confirms receipt of the reports
*LPA took a lunch break during the visit. |