1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | The Executive Director’s interview confirmed an email was sent out to all residents and a copy was posted at the front desk for notification. The facility usually locks the door in the evenings around 5:30pm. The facility now has regular concierge services. Therefore, the door remains unlocked until approximately 8pm. The doorbell is accessible for after- hours access.
The facility did not issue the new front door key to any residents for safety reasons. The facility did not lock R1 out of the facility. R1’s interview revealed conflicting statements that they were knocking on the door, then stated they were not knocking on the door for entry. R1’s interview also revealed S1 approached the front door to open it for R1 and told R1 to ring the doorbell and stop banging on the door. According to R1, they were going to be written up by S1 for banging on the door. No write ups were issued. S1’s interview confirmed they did not threaten R1. S1 revealed R1 was the individual that stated they were going to write S1 up, not the other way around. R1 wanted to use S1’s personal cell and S1 declined. R1 then asked to use a phone restricted to residents. When S1 denied access to the restricted phone, R1 made the comment about a write up. Further staff interviews confirmed staff are not threatening any residents and R1 usually threatens staff.
During the course of the investigation, interviews were conducted, and records were reviewed. Investigation revealed inconsistent statements and information obtained did not present a preponderance of evidence to support or corroborate the allegations. The allegations are deemed unsubstantiated. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report along with Licensee Rights (LIC 9058 03/22) were provided to Executive Director, Emily DeLaBarre whose signature below confirms receipt of these rights.
|