1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Staff 1 (S1) denied witnessing or being informed of any inappropriate touching and described standard supervision practices, including routine rounding and immediate intervention when residents require redirection. S1 confirmed understanding of mandated reporting requirements and facility protocols for responding to allegations of abuse.
Two (2) residents were interviewed; both denied experiencing or witnessing inappropriate touching and reported that staff are generally present and responsive in common areas.
Outside source 1 (OS1), reported no concerns regarding supervision and stated they had not been informed of any incidents of inappropriate contact. OS1 described staff interactions as professional and consistent with resident rights.
A review of facility records, including incident logs, communication notes, and staffing schedules, revealed no documented incidents confirming that a resident was touched inappropriately due to lack of supervision.
Staffing schedules matched observed coverage and indicated adequate ratios with qualified personnel on duty. Training records showed staff had completed in-service training on abuse prevention, professional boundaries, and mandated reporting requirements. Facility policies addressing supervision, abuse prevention, and reporting were current and consistent with regulatory standards.
Based on observations, interviews, and records reviewed, there is insufficient evidence to support the allegation that lack of supervision resulted in a resident being touched inappropriately. Therefore, the allegation is deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED. An exit interview was conducted with Eric Mendoza, caregiver to whom a copy of this report and the Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC9058 03/22) were provided. |