1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | [Continuation of LIC 9099]
On November 5, 2025, the Department visited the facility and interviewed R1, who stated that the incident occurred approximately two months earlier. According to R1, the bracelet had been placed on a nightstand next to their recliner at approximately 9:00 p.m., but the following morning it was missing. R1 believed the bracelet had been taken and later returned four days afterward by S1. The Department subsequently interviewed S1, who acknowledged awareness of both the missing bracelet and the missing facility phone but denied involvement in the disappearance of either item. S1 also claimed not to know how the items were eventually located.
The Department interviewed three additional staff members (S2, S3, and S4) who were working during the period of the alleged thefts. S2 and S3 reported that items began disappearing after S1 was hired. S2 believed the facility’s iPhone had been taken by S1, as S1 was the only staff member on shift when the phone went missing. Staff also reported other missing items, including jewelry and debit cards, following shifts worked by S1. S4 disclosed that they personally observed the facility’s red iPhone at S1’s residence and believed it had been given to S1’s landlord (OS1) as payment for past-due rent. OS1 was interviewed and confirmed that S1 had provided them with a red phone as collateral. The phone was later given to S4, who returned it to the facility. OS1 also reported that S1 was subsequently evicted for being two months behind on rent.
On November 5, 2025, the Department interviewed ADM, who admitted being aware of the thefts. ADM stated that after learning of the missing items, they informed all staff that if the facility phone and jewelry were not returned by October 21, 2025, law enforcement would be contacted. ADM reported that on October 20, 2025, S1 called and confessed to taking R1’s bracelet. ADM met S1 in a public location to retrieve the bracelet and returned it to R1. S4 also located and retrieved the missing phone from S1’s landlord. It should be noted that the phone had been reported missing two months before S4’s employment began.
[Continued on LIC 9099C] |