1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | [Continued from LIC 9099]
Based on staff interviews, instruction of threatening residents with eviction was communicated to staff, however the actual threat of eviction was never actually passed along to the residents. Staff interviews corroborated that eviction notices were not issued. During LPA's initial visit to the facility, LPA observed the "Active Evictions" list in the office, and the names on that list did not match any of those listed in the complaint. Interviews with the residents named in the complaint revealed that they had not been issued any instructions to change their medical providers and most were able to name their primary care physician and psychiatrist. One (1) resident did state they had seen the facility's psychiatrist once at the request of staff, but afterwards indicated they did not like the provider and wanted to continue seeing their established provider. An additional staff interview revealed that the medical providers are not contracted with the facility, but rather simply have established rapport with the facility and population of residents, which makes for ease of obtaining medication refills and scheduling visits. Per the interview, residents always have to the choice to see an outside provider, and that the in-house providers are an option should a resident wish to be seen sooner.
File review of resident records revealed that four (4) residents had inconsistencies of who they stated they see for appointments and who was listed on their record as their provider. File review of the appointment sheet documented that several residents refused appointments with the doctor, including three (3) of the four (4) who had that provider listed as their doctor on their records. The fourth resident was not included on the appointment list at all. Outside sources interviewed corroborated that residents normally see the facility in-house doctors. One (1) however did raise concerns about not being notified of resident medical appointments and billing inconsistencies, but had no concerns about resident care.
Based on interviews and records review, while the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred – therefore the allegation has been determined to be UNSUBSTANTIATED. An exit interview was conducted with Administrator Alvarado to whom a copy of this report and the Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC 9058) were provided. Their signature below confirms receipt of these documents. |