1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Multiple staff were interviewed, however based on the interviews conducted it was disclosed that staff have never witnessed Staff #1 (S1) being inappropriate with children nor have they witnessed Child #1 (C1) and Child #2 (C2) exhibit any sexual behaviors while at school. Additional interviews were also conducted with confidential witnesses, however Special Investigator could not extract any valuable information or relevant information pertaining to allegations. C1 and C2 were interviewed but neither interviews produced evidence of the alleged violations taking place. S1 was interviewed and denied the claims and said it never happened.
Based on the information provided during the investigation, there is not enough corroborating evidence which showed that facility staff made children inappropriately interact with one another or that staff grabbed child's private area. Therefore, the allegation is unsubstantiated.
An exit interview was conducted, and this report was reviewed with the Authorized Representative Karina Alvarez, and a copy was provided. Appeal rights were discussed and provided during the exit interview.
A Notice of Site visit was given, and Authorized Representative understands that it must remain posted for 30 days. |