1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Three out of three confidential interviews denied that C1 was handled in a rough manner. Interviews consistently reported that staff picked up C1 by the upper arm as a quick response to console the child, and that the staff member was simultaneously supporting another infant. Staff stated that they assisted C1 in a moment of urgency rather than picking up the child from under the arms or requesting additional assistance.
Regarding the allegation that C1 fell due to staff neglect, three out of four interviews denied observing any fall or injury. Interviewees stated that if a child experienced an injury above the shoulders, the center would have followed its standard reporting procedures, including completing appropriate documentation and notifying the parent. No witnesses or documentation were available to confirm that a fall occurred as alleged.
Due to conflicting statements, lack of witnesses, and absence of supporting documentation, LPA was unable to determine whether the child was handled in a rough manner, whether staff failed to follow reporting requirements, or whether a fall occurred due to staff neglect. These allegations may have occurred, however, they are not supported or proven by evidence. Therefore, the allegations are unsubstantiated.
An exit interview was conducted, a copy of this report, appeal rights, and a Notice of Site Visit were provided to Director, Stephanie Mangione. The Notice of Site Visit must remain posted in a prominent location, visible to families and caregivers, for 30 consecutive days.
|