1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Staff did state that C5 was crying while sitting in the highchair as a result of the discipline, however, C5 calmed down within a few minutes. Licensee stated she provides children breakfast every morning and reported she follows a child nutrition program menu and schedule. During inspection conducted on 07/11/2025 and 07/24/2025, LPA observed a sufficient supply of food available at the facility.
It was alleged that licensee does not ensure that daycare children are adequately supervised while in care due to the licensee frequently being distracted by their cellphone. The licensee denied the allegation, but admitted to always carrying her cellphone, stating that it is the primary mode of communication with daycare parents during operating hours. The licensee explained that children are allowed “free time” in the mornings during check-ins and when additional staff arrive at the facility, they begin a more structured schedule of activities to entertain the children throughout the day.
During interviews with the children, it was disclosed that the provider and the staff are present supervising. Parents interviewed did not disclose any concerns or issues with the facility or staff.
Due to conflicting information obtained throughout the course of the investigation and no other witnesses to the alleged incidents, LPA was unable to determine whether or not the allegation occurred. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are unsubstantiated.
Exit interview conducted and report was reviewed with the licensee Esperanza Martinez. A Notice of Site Visit was given and must remain posted for 30 days. LPA observed that the notice of site visit was posted during the inspection. Failure to comply with posting requirements shall result in an immediate civil penalty of $100. |