1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | According to staff, the doors to the van automatically close with the push of a button, and C1 must have stepped back inside the vehicle to retrieve something, unbeknownst to S1. Staff claimed that C1 was found in a matter of minutes, when the vehicle alarm sounded due to the C1 opening the car door from the inside.
Staff interviewed speculated that C1 soiled their clothes in their sleep during transportation from school pick up. C1 recalled the incident and stated that he soiled his pants while he was sleeping during the car ride. Other daycare children present at the time of the incident stated that C1 had soiled himself at the daycare in the past on several occasions, and that it is common for C1 to soil himself if he drinks water before sleeping. LPA reviewed the Chula Vista Police Report which determined there was insufficient evidence to support C1 being left inside of the vehicle for an extended period of time. Daycare parents interviewed did not communicate any concerns and are satisfied with the care their children receive. Furthermore, discussion with licensee confirmed that they understand children are not to be left alone in parked vehicles.
Based on interviews and records reviewed, it was confirmed that C1 returned to the licensee’s vehicle unattended; however, the timeline remains unclear, LPA was unable to determine, whether or not, C1 was left in a car unattended or in soiled clothing for hours, as alleged, or even for an extended period of time. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation(s) did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED.
Exit interview was conducted and this report was reviewed with Licensee, Erica Pastenes. Appeal Rights (LIC 9058) was provided. A Notice of Site Visit was provided and must remain posted for 30 days. |