1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Information obtained during interviews corroborated that on March 10, 2026, the licensee was not operating within the required ratio and was without an assistant for at least one hour. The licensee acknowledged the incident and stated that she had misunderstood the regulation, believing she could operate without an assistant for a brief period. After LPA reviewed the regulation with the licensee, she stated that she has a clear understanding of the requirements regarding ages, ratios, and supervision. Based on the evidence gathered and interviews conducted, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met; therefore, the allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED.
Regarding the allegation Licensee does not provide adequate supervision to children. During the investigation, LPA Gerth made (3) unannounced visits the family childcare and conducted observations during each visit. On 03/12/26 and 03/20/26, LPA gathered evidence pertinent to the investigation. On 03/13/26, 03/18/26, 04/09/26, additional interviews were conducted in relation to the allegation. Observations and Interviews conducted corroborated that the Licensee has not provided adequate supervision to children in care, specifically when the stairs have not remained barricaded during daycare hours. Licensee had been previously reminded of this regulation when on 08/08/2025, LPA had issued a Technical Violation and provided consultation on the regulation during an annual inspection. Therefore, based on LPA’s observation, interviews and documents gathered, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED.
See 9099 D page for deficiencies cited
A copy of this report, appeal rights and Notice of Site Visit were provided to Licensee Laila Sahli and was reminded that the “Notice of Site Visit” must be posted for 30 consecutive days. Failure to post will result in Civil Penalties of $100.00. |