1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | staff reported observing the licensee denying daycare children more food, on multiple occasions. During interview with LPA, Daycare child #1 (C1) reported they had been denied food, when asking the licensee for additional servings. Interview with representative from outside food program and review of inspection records did not reveal any concerns. The parents interviewed did not have concerns and stated their children enjoy the food. During facility inspection conducted on LPA observed sufficient food supply available.
It was also alleged that the Licensee does not ensure that day care children are provided with a comfortable environment while in care, by requiring the children to play outside in inclement weather. The licensee denied the allegation, explaining that the children do not go outside if the weather is too cold or hot and instead stay inside. Staff interviews gave conflicting information, some stating the children would be forced to be outdoors for a prolonged period and in cold conditions while others stated it was only prolonged but did not mention any other concerns. Parent Interviews did not reveal any concerns. The children interviewed revealed that they enjoy going outdoors and like to play.
Due to conflicting information obtained throughout the course of the investigation and no other witnesses to the alleged incidents, LPA was unable to determine whether or not the allegations occurred. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are unsubstantiated
Exit interview conducted and report was reviewed with the licensee. A Notice of Site Visit was given and must remain posted for 30 days. Failure to comply with posting requirements shall result in an immediate civil penalty of $100.
|