1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | In regards to allegation that infant sustained unexplained injury while in care, based on interviews conducted 4 out of 4 staff members interviewed stated that Child #1 (C1) had tripped in the classroom and Staff #1 (S1) did send a message to the parents informing them letting them know of the incident and notifying them that no mark was seen at time of incident. It was also disclosed that S1 wrote an incident report, but it wasn't given to the parent the same day.
Lastly, pertaining to the allegation that staff caused injury to infant, based on interviews conducted 3 out of 3 staff members interviewed stated that S1 has never been seen injuring a child, nor have they had any concerns with S1 in the classroom. LPA interviewed S1 and S1 stated that they have never injured a child, nor do they have long nails that could potentially scratch a child.
Based on the information obtained during this investigation, it has been determined that although the allegations may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that the alleged violations did or did not occur. Therefore, the allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED.
An exit interview was conducted, and this report was reviewed with the Director, Ellen Wickramasinghe, and a copy was provided. Appeal rights were discussed and provided during the exit interview.
A Notice of Site visit was given, and Director understands that it must remain posted for 30 days. |