1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | The second allegation claimed that staff were not providing adequate supervision because they were using cell phones during nap time. Three out of three confidential interviews denied the allegation, stating that staff occasionally use cell phones to communicate with parents in real time when necessary. Surveillance video corroborated that children remained within staff’s line of sight while cell phones were in use. Interviews also indicated that parent contact occurred only when nap time was disrupted. No evidence was found to support inadequate supervision.
The third allegation stated that staff used highchairs as a restraint device. Two of two confidential interviews denied the allegation, and explained that the built-in highchairs, which are part of the classroom table system, are used for feeding and activities. Staff reported they redirect children as part of their training and do not use highchairs for disciplinary purposes. With no witnesses or corroborating documentation, LPA was unable to determine whether highchairs were used as restraint devices in the infant classroom.
Based on interviews, observations, and record review, LPA was unable to corroborate the allegations that staff handled child in a rough manner resulting in injury, failed to provide adequate supervision, or used highchairs as restraint devices. The allegations may have occurred; however, they are not supported or proven by evidence. Therefore, the allegations are determined to be unsubstantiated.
An exit interview was conducted. A copy of this report, the appeal rights, and a Notice of Site Visit were provided to Assistant Director, Mahsa Najafi. The Notice of Site Visit must remain posted in a prominent location visible to families and caregivers for 30 consecutive days.
|