1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Staff also reported that remaining children were relocated to classrooms farther from the construction area. Children interviewed stated that some peers left due to the smell; one child reported a headache, while others did not report any effects. One of six parents interviewed stated that the construction odor was strong.
Although an odor affected the two front classrooms, staff turned on the air conditioning to circulate the air, covered the bottom of the doors to reduce the odor, contacted parents for pick-up, and relocated children to classrooms farther from the affected areas. The facility had also notified parents of the planned construction in advance through a written memo.
Based on interview statements, there was insufficient evidence and statements were conflicting. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur. Therefore, the allegation that staff did not prevent the facility from becoming malodorous is deemed unsubstantiated.
No deficiencies cited.
Notice of site visit was given and must remain posted for 30 days. Exit interview was conducted and this report was reviewed with the Site Supervisor, Cynthia Rosales.
|