1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | It was alleged that on 08/04/22, a staff member (S1) handled a day-care child (C1) in a physically inappropriate manner. It was also alleged the facility is threatening retaliation for filing a complaint with the local licensing department.
All nine (9) staff interviewed, including S1, denied the above allegations, stating they were not aware or have witnessed any staff member handling a child inappropriately. Seven (7) out of eight (8) children interviewed stated they enjoy the day-care, playing with friends, have not observed staff handling children in a rough manner and think their teachers are nice. According to C1, S1 grabbed C1’s shirt and pulled her arm, during an interaction that occurred on the play yard. There were no other witnesses to the alleged incident, nor video footage reviewed that support or prove the incident occurred. All parents interviewed, stated they have not observed any staff handling a child in a rough manner and are very satisfied with the care their children receive.
Site Supervisor denied the retaliation allegation explaining that termination and reenrollment policies and procedures have been communicated to parents in the past.
Due to conflicting information obtained throughout the course of the investigation, LPA was unable to determine whether or not the allegations occurred. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are unsubstantiated.
Exit interview conducted and report was reviewed with Site Supervisor, Yanira Molina. A copy of this report, along with Appeal Rights (LIC9058 01/16), were provided. A notice of site visit was given and must remain posted for 30 days. LPA observed that the notice of site visit was posted during the inspection. Failure to comply with posting requirements shall result in an immediate civil penalty of $100. |