Deficiency Type
POC Due Date /
Section Number | DEFICIENCIES | PLAN OF CORRECTIONS(POCs) |
Type B
02/23/2025
Section Cited
CCR
101223(a)(2) | 1
2
3
4
5
6
7 | Personal Rights: (a)The licensee shall ensure that each child is accorded the following personal rights...(2) To be accorded safe, healthful, aequirement was not met as evidenced bnd comfortable accommodations, furnishings, and equipment to meet his/her needs. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: | 1
2
3
4
5
6
7 | Ms. Tovar states that there will be a staff meeting conducted by the plan of correction date to address appropriate personal rights and appropriate discipline, using this incident as an example. |
 | 8
9
10
11
12
13
14 | Based on interviews, a staff member acknowledged restricting a child in a high chair for discipline, a purpose other than the intended uses of the furniture, which poses a potential health, safety, or personal rights risk to children in care. | 8
9
10
11
12
13
14 | A signed roster and agenda of the staff meeting will be sent to Licensing, via email, by 2/23/25. |
Type B
02/23/2025
Section Cited
CCR
101223.2(a) | 1
2
3
4
5
6
7 | Discipline: (a) Any form of discipline or punishment that violates a child's personal rights as specified in Section 101223 shall not be permitted regardless of authorized representative consent or authorization. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: | 1
2
3
4
5
6
7 | Licensee and director states that there will be a staff meeting conducted by the plan of correction date to address appropriate personal rights and appropriate discipline, using this incident as an example, and addressing what to do when children target their peers. |
 | 8
9
10
11
12
13
14 | Based on interview, a staff member acknowledged restricting a child in a high chair for up to five minutes, for their actions against other children and as tia “me out” disciplinary measure, which poses a potential health, safety, or personal rights risk to children in care. | 8
9
10
11
12
13
14 | A signed roster and agenda of the staff meeting will be sent to Licensing, via email, by 2/23/25. |
NARRATIVE |
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | determined that there was conflicting staff information about the severity of the “blowout,” the child’s reaction/action following the incident, and the extent of supervision – namely, the timeliness of the staff response in relation to when the incident occurred.
It was alleged that “staff are not reporting incidents to responsible party.” This allegation references an incident on 10/22/24 in which child C1, received a scratch from another student. LPA reviewed documentation showing that at least three staff were aware of the incident and that at least one staff verbalized the incident to the child’s parent. Through interviews, the licensee and staff identified common reporting processes including verbal or written documentation to senior staff or to a child’s parent. Other potentially unreported incidents were mentioned by the RP, but without supporting information. Parents interview expressed no concerns or issues with how injury incidents are reported.
It was alleged that “facility did not address pest infestation in a timely manner.” The RP identified October 2024 as the time period when fleas and bedbugs went unaddressed. LPA determined that infestation was present and was addressed with pest control and carpet cleaning. However, interviews with staff resulted in conflicting information – specifically, the approximate timeline of when pests were present (July through October), who was affected (staff or children), and when facility’s leadership responded to the issue.
Based on the information obtained during interviews and documentation reviewed it is determined that
the above allegations cannot be proven or disproven. Therefore, they are considered UNSUBSTANTIATED. A finding that the complaint is unsubstantiated means that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred.
Exit interview conducted and report was reviewed with Rubi Tovar, center director. Notice of site visit was provided and must be posted for 30 days. Failure to comply with posting requirements shall result in an immediate civil penalty of $100. Appeal rights were provided. |