1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13 | Based on review of client and facility records and interviews with staff, witnesses, as well as resident, this allegation is determined to be substantiated.
Former client #1 was admitted to facility on 11/4/21 directly from SNF, after sustaining a hip fracture. Placement into the memory care unit with delayed egress was facilitated by client's Durable Power of Attorney and deemed to be the most appropriate, considering client's safety and risk assessment. In addition to client's physical condition, she exhibited poor judgement, increased confusion and risky behaviors prior to the injury. Client did not object to admission to RCFE. However, she did not provide verbal or written consent of admission to memory care unit with delayed egress.
Deficiency of the California Code of Regulations, Title 22 is cited on a following page. |