1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13 | On 09/2/2026, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Albert Johnson arrived unannounced at this facility to conduct a complaint visit. LPA met with Staff Members and explained the purpose of the visit.
Based on interviews, records reviewed, and regulatory requirements, the allegation that Golden Haven violated the personal rights of R1 is substantiated. Although the Public Guardian’s Office issued visitation restrictions without judicial approval, the facility implemented the restrictions believing they were authorized. No evidence supports that the facility knowingly or willfully violated personal rights.The investigation included interviews with facility staff, the administrator, the Public Guardian’s Office, and family members. Licensing also reviewed conservatorship documents, facility policies, resident records, and the July 09, 2026 visitation directive issued by the Public Guardian’s Office. The Public Guardian’s Office submitted a letter imposing visitation restrictions; however, no court order, judicial approval, or conservatorship condition authorizing limitations on personal rights was provided. The facility implemented the restrictions based solely on the Public Guardian’s directive.
Based on interviews and records reviewed, the allegation is substantiated. As a result of this investigation, the Department finds this allegation to be Substantiated. A finding that the complaint is substantiated means that the allegation is valid because the preponderance of the evidence standard has been met. Deficiency cited on the LIC 9099-D page, per Title 22 Regulations.
|