1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Based on interviews, there were no reports expressed of residents being left unattended for extended periods of time. As a result, the preponderance of evidence standard is not met, and this allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED
Allegation #2: Staff are not responding to requests for assistance in a timely manner. LPA conducted interviews with residents and responsible parties, and conducted facility observations as noted above. LPA observed staff on duty to be attending to resident needs within 5 minutes based on rounds conducted and signal system usage. Interviews conducted did not reveal lack of timely assistance when requested by residents in care. As a result, there is not a preponderance of evidence to conclude staff are not responding to requests for assistance in a timely manner, and this allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED.
Allegation #3: Staff are not responding to requests for communication with resident’s representatives in a timely manner. LPA conducted interviews as noted above. Based on interviews conducted, it was determined that residents’ representatives have been contacted upon request and received responses from various departments including care giving and reception desk on same day or within 24 hours of requests. Additionally, based on interviews, it was undetermined if requests were made by specific residents’ responsible persons. As a result, there is not a preponderance of evidence to conclude staff not responding to request for communication with resident representatives, and this allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED.
Allegation #4: Facility does not have adequate lighting. LPA conducted facility observations on 1-6-23 and 3-7-23. LPA observed lobby area of facility as well as all facility hallways and various resident rooms. Based on observations conducted as well as interviews with R1, R2, and R3, it was determined that adequate lighting exist throughout facility. LPA observed light bulbs to be functioning as normal during observation. As a result, there is not a preponderance of evidence to conclude that facility maintains inadequate lighting. Therefore, this allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED.
An exit interview was conducted with Michele Fischer and a copy of this report was left with Michele. Appeal rights provided. |