1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Additionally, R1's Incontinence Care Document indicates R1 was being provided inconsistent incontinence checks. The Incontinence Care Document is missing times and dates, and the document indicates R1 was found with a soiled brief at times. According to R1's Incontinence Care document, R1 was found eight times with a soiled brief.
For example, on March 10, 2024, R1 received the following incontinence check: 6:00 AM R1 was found with dry brief. R1 received a second incontinence check at 10:30 AM, which R1 was found with a wet brief. R1 received a third incontinence check at 4 PM, and per Incontinence Care Document it stated, " brief raggedy wet". On another entry dated March 14, 2024, R1 was found with a wet brief and was showered. Based the obtained documents, R1 was not provided consistent incontinence care, and as a result, R1's hygiene was not maintained.
As a result of this investigation, the Department finds this allegation to be Substantiated. A finding that the complaint is substantiated means that the allegation is valid because the preponderance of the evidence standard has been met. Deficiency cited on the LIC 9099-D, per Title 22 Regulations. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report was provided to the facility. |