1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Allegation: Staff are not following physician orders. LPA conducted interviews and record reviews as noted above. Based on record review, it was revealed that medications for residents were consistently given as ordered between January 2025 to current. Additionally, a review of medication log sheets revealed matched physician orders. Interviews conducted did not reveal any corroborated statements to indicate physician orders not followed. As a result, the preponderance of evidence standard is not met, and this allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED.
Allegation: Staff are giving resident “edibles” that are not prescribed to resident. LPA conducted interviews, record reviews, and facility observation as noted above. Based interviews and observation, it was revealed that resident2 (R2) consumes edibles which are stored in a locked device located in the facility for safety purposes, however, no evidence exists through interviews, observation, or record review to indicate staff have dispensed edibles to R2. Additionally, edibles do not appear on medication log sheets reviewed or physician orders to indicate instruction for staff to dispense edibles. As a result, the preponderance of evidence standard is not met, and this allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED.
A finding of unsubstantiated means the allegation may have happened or is valid, but there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred.
An exit interview was conducted with Administrator and a copy of this report was provided. Appeal rights provided. |