1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | As a result, there is not a preponderance of evidence existing which reveals facility staff are willfully leaving residents soaked in urine at night, therefore this allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. A finding of unsubstantiated means that the allegation may have happened or is valid, but there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred.
Allegation: Facility does not provide a safe environment for the residents. LPA conducted interviews and record reviews as noted above. LPA also conducted a facility observation as noted above. Based on interviews, record reviews, and observation, it was determined that facility received an approved fire inspection last updated 2-26-24. Facility sketch reviewed revealed consistency between the sketch and physical facility layout. Additionally, it was revealed that the facility maintains a staff presence 24 hours per day, 7 days per week. Facility observation revealed railings and grab bars in appropriate locations within the facility and per regulatory requirements as well as adequate lighting in place for outside porch areas. Non-skid mats and grab bars were observed in bathrooms during facility observation and no obstructions to fire exits were noted. Interviews conducted revealed a presence of safety within the facility at this time. As result, there is not a preponderance of evidence to conclude that the facility currently is not or has not provided a safe environment for residents in care, therefore, this allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. A finding of unsubstantiated means that the allegation may have happened or is valid, but there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred.
An exit interview was conducted with S1 and a copy of this report was provided to S1. Appeal rights provided. |