1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Allegation: Staff cancel resident’s medical appointments without explanation. LPA conducted interview and record reviews as noted above. Based on the evidence reviewed it was revealed that R1 previously had regular scheduled appointments for dialysis throughout the months of March, April, and May of 2026. Additional medical appointments were also noted for lab work, physical therapy, heart check-ups, and other physician appointments. Records reviewed and interviews revealed no evidence of staff-initiated cancellations of appointments. As a result, the preponderance of evidence standard is not met, and this allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED.
Allegation: Staff are not assisting resident with obtaining medical care. LPA conducted interview and record reviews as noted above. Based on the evidence reviewed, it was revealed that R1 previously required medical attention regarding diet restrictions, medication changes, behaviors, and dialysis. Further evidence revealed that staff have been providing on-going interactions regarding the above including arranging medical appointments for consultation. As a result, the preponderance of evidence standard is not met, and this allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED.
A finding of unsubstantiated means the allegation may have happened or is valid, but there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred.
An exit interview was conducted with Administrator and a copy of this report was provided. Appeal rights provided. |