1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13 | On January 20, 2023 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Stacey Williams arrived at the facility for the purpose of delivering complaint findings. LPA met with Licensee. LPA observed 12 preschool aged children supervised by Licensee and her Assistant. Criminal record clearances were verified.
LPA conducted an investigation regarding the allegation listed above. The facility was toured and interviews were conducted with the Licensee, children attending the Licensee's program and parents of children in the program. Additional pertinent documentation was received to assist with the investigation. Licensee denied the allegation and reported that her husband is her Assistant for the childcare program and ratio is met at all times. The facility roster was reviewed. The facility was visited during the investigation where the Licensee was operating within ratio. The reporting party is anonymous with no contact information provided, therefore LPA was unable to conduct an interview to discuss the allegation. Based on the evidence received, the allegation is determined to be unsubstantiated. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur.
No Title 22 deficiencies have been cited for this complaint.
An Exit Interview was conducted in which the report was reviewed and discussed with Licensee,Shwetha Shwetha. Appeal rights provided. A notice of site visit was provided and must remain posted for 30 days. Failure to comply with posting requirements shall result in an immediate civil penalty of $100.
|