1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | 9099 CONT. >>>>>>>>
During the course of the investigation LPAs interviewed residents and staff. LPAs toured facility. LPA reviewed resident and facility records. It was observed during the facility tour, menus posted in Memory care was 2 days old, menus posted in front lobby was not updated with changes to what was being served. LPAs observed food prepared for dinner service was not covered properly. Meat for main course, strawberry dessert, and side dishes were prepared and not covered. During a subsequential visit at lunchtime, kitchen staff told LPAs food left out were for staff to have. Lunch service was completed. LPAs observed a server pack a to go tray and delivered the tray to a resident. Server delivered it at approx.. 1pm. Lunch service begins at appro 1130am. LPAs observed dinner being served approx 20 minutes late. Residents stated they are having to wait approx 20-30 minutes for their meals. LPAs observed the same staff that provided food service to Memory Care was moved to provide food service to Assisted Living.
Records reviewed show an increase number of altercations in memory care between the residents. Resident interviews they did not feel safe due to altercations. Records show as preventative measures, medical attention needed for residents due to altercation. Based on interviews and records reviewed, the allegations staff is not sufficient to meet needs of residents, residents do not feel safe, facility food is not being handled is a safe manner, facility is not following menu have been deemed SUBSTANTIATED.
This agency has investigated the allegation notice and has found the allegation to be substantiated meaning that there was a preponderance of evidence to prove the allegation was true as reported.
The following deficiency was cited per Title 22 Provision 6 of the CA Code of Regulations. An exit interview was conduct. A copy of this report along with appeal rights was provided via email. |