1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Allegation #2: Facility failed to notify law enforcement in a timely manner
Based on interviews conducted and record reviews as noted above, it was determined that R1 eloped from facility on 5-17-22. Incident report dated 5-18-22 indicated facility staff noticed resident missing at approximately 4:45pm on 5-17-22, and were not aware of R1’s whereabouts. Based on police report reviewed, a report from facility staff was made at 7:02pm on 5-17-22 to police department to report missing resident. Interviews also revealed that R1’s responsible party member did not observe resident in his room at approximately 2:30pm during a visit on 5-17-22. Facility’s missing resident policy reviewed and noted on R1’s needs and service plan states law enforcement are to be notified within 30 minutes should resident not be located. Based on interviews and record reviews, it is determined that law enforcement was notified outside the 30-minute window, therefore this allegation is SUBSTANTIATED.
Allegation #3: Facility failed to report to responsible party that resident had left unattended
Based on interviews conducted and record reviews as noted above, it was determined that R1 eloped from facility on 5-17-22. Incident report dated 5-18-22, states at 5:50pm a member of R1’s family called facility regarding R1’s missing status. Incident report further states police were called with no time mentioned. An additional statement on the incident report states a family member of R1 was at facility and notified that R1 was at local hospital. Incident report did not state power of attorney for R1 was notified by facility of R1’s initial missing status. Document review indicates name of power of attorney for R1. This individual was not indicated on the incident report as notified by facility due to R1’s missing status. Additional interviews indicate responsible party for R1 was not notified of R1's missing and inability to locate and did not receive a written notice of incident. Based on record reviews and interviews, it is determined that R1’s family was not notified per regulatory requirements, and this allegation is SUBSTANTIATED.
Allegation #4: Staff not properly trained on AWOL procedures.
Based on interviews conducted and record reviews as noted above, it was determined that R1 eloped from facility on 5-17-22. Interviews revealed that 4 of 4 staff members interviewed have not been trained on facility’s Absence Without Leave (AWOL) procedures. An additional interview with Administrator revealed AWOL training was not included in the staff training curriculum at the time of R1’s elopement episode on 5-17-22. Furthermore, it was determined based on interviews that facility has a history of other residents identified as elopement risks. {Cont. on 9099C}
|