1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Three instances of Staff #1 (S1) working by themselves while other staff were on site in the kitchen and medications room. One staff on site overnight and statements conclude conflicting statements if that is adequate supervision of residents. Resident #1 (R1) Medication Administration Record documented missed medications for refusal, all routine and PRN medications administered per physicians’ order. Medication #1 (M1) alleged to not be administered per physicians’ order not documented on Centrally Stored as prescribed to R1 per R1’s responsible party. R1’s care plan documents demanding behavior “staff will not argue with resident and set clear reminders, still will use a calm voice when speaking to the resident, staff do not argue with the resident”. R1’s care plan documents non compliance behavior “staff do no argue with the resident, instead offer clear reminder the resident already agreed to follow the community rules”. Interviews conclude staff are provided training during on boarding but S1 did not receive additional training upon request to supervisor. One incident S1 reported “she lost it” but could not recall details of calling R1 inappropriate names. Other interview conclude staff may or may not have called R1 inappropriate names during times R1 was engaged in behaviors.
It was determined in the course of the investigation based on the information provided through documentation and interview, the allegations are unsubstantiated. A finding that the allegation is unsubstantiated means that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred.
Per California Code of Regulations (CCRs) - Title 22, no deficiencies are being cited. Exit interview conducted with Residential Service Supervisor and copy of report provided. |