1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | In support of that statement, no mention of the physician is made in a record review of emails to the authorized representative provided by the facility, or annual and quarterly reports by a relevant third party(VMRC) where other physicians are mentioned by name and role. The LPA notes that the signature on the Emergency Contact documentation designating the role of the physician appears not to be the signature of the authorized representative.
Based on LPAs observations and interviews and record review(s), the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation(s) is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. California Code of Regulations, (Title 22, Division 6 & Chapter 6 85072 (b)(2)), is being cited on the attached LIC 9099D.
A copy of the appeal rights were provided, a exit interview was conducted and a copy of the report was left with the staff. |