1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | On 12/30/2020, a forensic interview was completed with R1. R1 did not make any disclosures that S1 had inappropriately touched R1. A Sexual Assault Response Team (SART) exam was not completed on R1 because R1 did not make any disclosures during the forensic interview. On 02/16/2021 at 10:19am, during a forensic interview, R1 disclosed the allegation of inappropriate touching by S1. On 02//22/2021, a SART exam was completed and R1 tested negative for any sexually transmitted infections.
S1 was interviewed on 01/14/2021 and 01/22/2021. S1 provided the same statement as the first interview by denying inappropriately touching R1. Detective Sloan stated there was no indication of S1 being deceptive based on the surveillance video of the facility that was reviewed.
Staff #5 (S5) was interviewed on 02/16/2021 at 1:18pm. and stated the following: R1 was a “Master Manipulator”. S5 has overheard phone conversations with R1 and R1’s friend. R1 has tried to make up stories in order to go home. R1 has said they didn’t want to live at the facility. R1 is abusive to R1’s representatives if R1 doesn’t get their way.
From 01/05/2021 to 03/18/2021, Investigator Rippe and Detective Sloan conducted numerous interviews with Administrator, staff, residents and witnesses. During the course of the investigation, R1 made several inconsistent statements during a forensic interview about the allegation. S1 denied inappropriately touching R1. Staff #4 (S4) was interviewed and denied inappropriate touching of R1. R1’s representative stated R1 had not made any prior disclosure that any staff or resident had inappropriately touched R1. Staff #5 (S5) described R1 as a master manipulator that R1 had made up stories in order to go home. A SART exam was completed on R1 and was a normal reading with negative findings. R1 was tested for sexually transmitted infections and the results were negative. An interview conducted with Resident #2 (R2) did not provide any information related to the current complaint allegation. The Atascadero Police Department case was closed and referred to the San Luis Obispo (SLO) District Attorney (DA) office for review of charges against S1. On 06/10/2021, the DA declined charges against S1.
Based on the information and documentation obtained and reviewed, the Department does not have sufficient evidence to support the above allegation. Therefore, the above allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time.
Exit interview, copy of report given. |