1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | On 10/05/2022, the Department referred the complaint to the Community Care Licensing Investigations Branch (IB) and Special Investigator Romelia Munoz was assigned to conduct the investigation in reference to the allegation of lack of supervision resulting in the client being sexually assaulted while in care.
On 10/06/2022, between 12:09 pm and 1:50 pm, LPA Chavez conducted an unannounced 24-hour complaint visit. LPA met with Debbie Starling, Licensee/Administrator, and informed her of the reason for the visit. Also, in attendance was the TCRC QAS. During the visit, the LPA interviewed the administrator and requested the following documentation: Incident Report, Identification and Emergency Information sheets, conservatorship documents, annual report, staff notes and staff schedule. The administrator was notified that the case was referred to Community Care Licensing Investigation's Branch (IB) Special Investigator Romelia Munoz for further investigation.
Investigator Munoz conducted interviews on 11/22/2022, at approximately 9:45 am, with facility staff; on 11/22/2022, at approximately 10:55 am, with C1; on 11/14/2022, between approximately 10:25 am and 12:30 pm, with C1, C2, and staff; on 11/16/2022, at approximately 10:30 am, with the administrator; on 12/27/2022, at approximately 11:45 am with a Witness #1 (W1); on 12/28/22 between approximately 12:00 pm and 2:15 pm with the administrator and Witness #2 (W2). Additionally, the Investigator reviewed copies of Atascadero Police Department’s police report and supplemental report, Notes from Day Program Director and facility documents related to C1.
The investigation revealed that on 10/03/2022, Client #1 (C1) reported to Staff #1 (S1) and the administrator that C2 had sex with C1 against C1’s will. C1 could not say the exact date this happened but says that C2 came into C1’s room while C1 was asleep at night, C2 pulled down C2’s pants and C2 put C2’s penis in C1’s vagina. C1 says that they told C2 “no” before C2 sexually assaulted C1. Staff #2 (S2) was the sole staff on-duty during the late evening to morning shift and did not witness the event due to being asleep in their room. C2 denies the allegation, however, C2 informs of an incident that occurred at the facility where C2 was left alone with C1 while staff were asleep. C2 describes that C1 slipped in the shower and fell and was partially dressed. C2 went into the restroom to assist C1 and took C1 back to C1’s bedroom. Administrator says staff did not respond to the fall incident because everyone is ambulatory and “C1 could have called with their cellphone.”
Continued on 9099-C. |