1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | CONTINUED from LIC99099-C When the LPA arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct the physical plant inspection related to this allegation there were two staff present for a single resident R2. Administrator Hector Sadorra stated that the facility has additional staff available from the licensee’s other facilities, who are associated to this facility and could help if needed. Administrator sated that there were no call offs in the last two months that were not filled in by additional staff. R2 was independently ambulatory and R3 required a two person assist in transferring. Licensee stated that additional staff who were cleared and available from mutually owned facility, near this facility were available to assist, if needed. During the investigation, there was insufficient evidence to prove a lack of staffing occurred. Therefore, the allegation of, “Facility does not have adequate staffing.” is unsubstantiated, at this time.
As to the allegation of, “Residents are not being cared for properly.” LPA conducted inspection of the facility physical plant, conducted file review and interviews. LPAs conducted a physical plant inspection and observed the facility to be clean, safe, and sanitary. LPA’s review of resident files indicated that all medications reviewed were given as prescribed. R1 received services from Home Health Care three times per week for catheter changes. Based on staff schedules reviewed, there were two or more staff present during daily shifts, and one staff present during the overnight shift, with additional staff on-call. S1, S2 and S3 indicated that efforts were made to encourage R1 to engage in daily activities, including board games, reading, television, puzzles, and walks (with wheelchair), however, R1 would decline and would refuse to engage in any activity. Based on the evidence obtained, there is not enough evidence to support the allegation of, “Residents are not being cared for properly.” Therefore, the allegation is unsubstantiated, at this time.
As to the allegation of, “Hoyer lift being used without proper staff training.” LPA conducted inspection of the facility physical plant, conducted file review and interviews. On 12/16/2019 at approximately 9:00am, LPA observed a Hoyer Lift in the backyard patio of the facility. LPA interviewed Administrator as to the current location of the Hoyer Lift. Administrator, Albert Gregorio, stated that, “it was outside because it was not being used.” LPA conducted a file review of R1s’ Physicians Report, Medical Records, Pre-Admissions Appraisal and Appraisals Needs and Services Plan. LPA observed in the Physicians Report that R1 needed transfer assistance. In addition, it was also noted that a mechanical assistance could be used, "if needed." LPA did not observe orders to specifically use a Hoyer lift in R1's Physicians Report. S1, S2 and S3 interviewed indicated that a single person lift for R1 was sufficient to meet R1's needs and the mechanical lift was not needed. All facility employees associated to this facility had received CONTINUED on LIC99099-C
|