1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25 | On 5/10/2022 at 3:45 pm, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Chavez arrived at the facility to conduct an unannounced case management visit. LPA informed Administrator Karen Enciso the reason for the visit.
During interview and record review, LPA determined that Staff #1 (S1) and Staff #2 (S2) were not associated to the facility when working in the community. On 5/09/22 at 2:56 pm, LPA confirmed S1's and S2’s identifications.
On 5/11/2021 at 9:02 am, Ms. Bradford stated in an email to LPA that S1 was the designated administrator on 5/18/21 and 5/19/21. On 5/09/22 at 2:53 pm, LPA performed a search in Guardian for S1, and S1 was not in Guardian and therefore not associated with the facility. On 7/06/21 at 4:09 pm, Former Business Office Manager Cathyann Paape emailed LPA to inform that Staff #2 (S2) was the administrator on record for the week of 6/06/21 to 6/12/21. On 5/09/22 at 3:10 pm, LPA searched in Guardian for S2. S2 was associated to the facility, however S2 was not associated until 7/06/21, after the dates S2 worked in the community. On 5/10/22, LPA interviewed the administrator who confirmed that S2 worked 6/07/21 through 6/11/21.
Pursuant to Title 22 Division 6 Chapter 8 of the CA Code of Regulations, the following deficiencies were cited (refer to LIC 809-D):
Civil penalties assessed in the amount of $1,000.00, $500 for each deficiency.
Exit interview conducted, and today's report, civil penalties, and appeal rights emailed to Administrator.
|