R1 says that when they are transported in the facility’s van, staff require R1 to get out of their scooter and sit in a van seat with a seatbelt. R1 says they don’t know why former staff allowed R1 to sit in their scooter in the van and why that has changed. R1 says that their doctor is working on getting R1 a motorized wheelchair because R1 feels they are no longer sitting properly in their current scooter. R1 comments that walkers are folded and laying on the van floor and when staff step on the brakes, they slide to the front seats.
The interim administrator says that R1 came to her about two months ago saying they didn’t feel safe with their scooter strapped down in the van. Administrator told R1 it would be better to transfer to a seat and use the seatbelt or sit in a wheelchair and strap it down.
The van’s driver says R1 does not sit properly in their scooter, that their body is not aligned with the scooter, and does not think it is safe to keep R1 in the scooter while being transported in the van.
Based on evidence obtained, the allegation is deemed unsubstantiated at this time. Staff made attempts to keep R1 safe while being transported.
On the allegation, “Facility staff do not treat residents with dignity and respect,” the complainant was concerned that staff told R1 that there were "special rules" for R1 and another resident but did not know what the rules were. The complainant believes these rules are due to R1 and the other resident being overweight. The complainant was also concerned that staff “constantly state that a rent increase could happen” due to these special rules.
Interim administrator says they treat all residents with dignity and respect and was addressing the situation according to their care plan procedures.
R1 says they were concerned about the rent increase and communicated to management that they were not able to pay but did not feel they were going to be evicted. R1 says they felt staff were treating them with dignity and that their only concern was that staff had difficulty pushing R1 in their wheelchair.
Based on evidence obtained, the allegation is deemed unsubstantiated at this time.
On the allegation, “Facility staff restricted residents from filing a complaint,” the complainant’s concern was that a memo was posted at the front of the facility asking all residents to bring any concerns to the administrator and not the ombudsman. Continued on 9099-C.
|