1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Page 2 Continued..
During the course of the investigation, LPA conducted observations, received pertinent documents, and interviewed staff. Through the staff interviews and observations that were conducted, it was determined that the facility does not provide meals that meet nutritional guidelines.
Based on interviews, facility offers a hot lunch option for children that are meals ordered by local restaurants, the restaurant brings the meals in serving containers that are then distributed to the children by staff. Per staff interviews, staff distribute the food to children without knowing the appropriate serving size for each child's age. Based on LPAs observations, food is brought in serving containers and LPA has observed staff serve food with a utensil or using their hand with a glove on not providing the appropriate serving size for the child's age. LPA also observed that the vegetable/protein being offered on some meals are not equally distributed.
Based on observations, interviews and record review which were conducted, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegations are found to be SUBSTANTIATED.
California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 12, Chapter 1, are being cited. Please refer to 9099D for more information.
Appeal rights were provided during visit. Plan of corrections were also discussed. A notice of site visit was given and must remain posted for 30 days. Failure to comply with posting requirements shall result in an immediate civil penalty of $100.
Exit interview conducted and report was reviewed with Site Director, Yun "Margaret" Zhang.
|