1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Regarding the allegation that staff failed to obtain medical intervention, according to the reporting party, R1 was observed to have bumps on his/her body and the staff assisting R1 to dress/undress did not seek appropriate medical intervention. During the investigation, LPA reviewed R1's file and interviewed staff. Based on file reviewed, the facility staff documented any change of condition as needed and was in communication with R1's physician regarding any change of condition R1 had. In addition, interviewed staff acknowledged that R1 has a history of skin condition and if R1 did have a change of condition, they notified the Administrator or the Life Guidance Director.
Regarding the allegation that staff spoke disrespectfully to clients and that staff is roughly handling clients, according to the reporting party, a staff member (name and description not identified) at the facility was rough with dressing R1 and when R1 told staff to slow down due to pain, the staff member told R1 to not tell him/her what to do in a rude tone. During the investigation, LPA interviewed the staff members, residents, and residents’ responsible parties. According to the residents interviewed, it was indicated that they really enjoy being around the staff and the staff are helpful when they need them. In addition, according to the responsible parties interviewed, it was indicated that they have good communication with the staff and they appreciate them. Furthermore, responsible parties interviewed, indicated that they never had any issues with the staff members.
Therefore, based on the documents reviewed and interviews conducted, the allegations above are UNSUBSTANTIATED, meaning that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is no preponderance of evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. |