1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | According to records review, R1 was able to store and administer own medications per R1’s Physician’s Report dated May 29, 2019. R1 has several medications prescribed by multiple doctors per Medication List printed on May 28, 2020 and the ALFUZOSIN medication was listed as prescribed by “Provider Unknown, MD.” On June 4, 2020, R1 enrolled in the facility’s medication program per R1’s Resident Functional Needs Service Plan.
According to staff interviews and signed documentation log, on May 31, 2020, facility staff started to attempt to obtain the signed doctor's order by contacting the Primary Care Physician (PCP)’s office but the PCP was unavailable. The on-duty doctor refused to sign the medication order stating that only the Prescribing Physician (RxP) or the PCP can send the order according to S2. On June 04, 2020, the ALFUZOSIN medication order was written and electronically signed by the RxP and submitted to Safeway Pharmacy (Safeway Rx) per Rx Image, which was an error according to S1 due to the ALFUZOSIN medication was not a Safeway Rx drug, which was confirmed by LPA on the Rx bottle. In addition, the Prescribing Pharmacy (Rx Phar) refused to provide the medication order to facility due to patient confidentiality according to the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) per S1. R1's Responsible Party (RP) was contacted to discuss the medication order issues from June 02, 2020 to June 05, 2020 according to two staff. The RP was also unsuccessful in obtaining the medication order according to S1. On June 07, 2020, the Rx Phar was contacted but no one was available to answer the phone per S2. On June 8, 2020, the facility obtained the Medication Clarification FAX Order submitted to the RxP on June 01, 2020 for the ALFUZOSIN medication after S1 contacted the PCP, RxP, Rx Phar, and Safeway Rx according to two staff, which was the earliest facility record of administration listed for R1’s ALFUZOSIN medication per facility’s Medication Administration Record.
An in-person visit to the pharmacies, and physicians’ clinics may have expedited in obtaining the signed doctor's order, but it was not advisable at the time due to COVID-19 pandemic according to the resident services director.
Based on staff interviews and record reviews the allegation was deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED, meaning that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred.
Report was discussed with the administrator. An electronic copy of the report was emailed to the administrator at the end of the investigation. |