1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | LPA interviewed the administrator/licensee who acknowledged that she did not obtain prior permission from R1’s responsible party to conduct an assessment of R1 at the Skilled Nursing Facility. However, the administrator/licensee stated the date of the visit was still within 30-day of the eviction notice. In addition, the administrator/licensee stated that she had provided proper introduction to the skilled nursing facility staff after she entered the facility, and she was provided with a name badge for the visit. Furthermore, She was given information by one of the Registered Nurses regarding R1’s care and she was allowed to physically assessed R1 in the room.
After the investigation, this allegation is deemed to be unsubstantiated as the date of the visit was still within the 30-day eviction notice and R1’s responsible party did not express to waive the 30-day eviction process. Therefore, based on R1’s admission agreement, R1 was still under the care of the facility.
Regarding the allegation of- Staff inappropriately made resident’s POA pay for groceries, the reporting party stated that R1 had a protein deficiency, so the doctor ordered more meat for R1. The reporting party stated that the facility staff brought more meat for R1 with their own money and asked R1’s responsible party for reimbursement.
As part of the investigation, LPA interviewed staff (S1) and the administrator/licensee.
LPA interviewed the administrator/licensee who denied the allegation and stated that the facility provided balanced meals for every resident but R1’s responsible party requested additional specific proteins such as organic yogurt, organic protein items and agreed to pay for it with R1’s income. However, R1’s income was delayed at the time, so the responsible party agreed to pay for it first.
According to S1, the facility was offering balanced meals to R1 as they followed a menus for breakfast, lunch and dinner but R1’s responsible party requested additional protein items such as yogurt, bacon, fish, etc and the responsible party consented to use R1’s money income to pay for it but R1’s income was delayed so R1’s responsible party agreed to pay for it first and reimburse the money back to S1. |